Following
my comments in Trakai a senior American contacted me to ask me why I
thought Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Gordon’s comments amounted to a
betrayal of Britain. There are four reasons:
1.
European
Geopolitics: This is the most strategic of European moments. Behind the Euro-speak good old-fashioned European geopolitics are
at work. Whilst modern, democratic
Germany is vastly different to past Germany the impulse in Berlin to unify Europe around
Germany remains and Washington is naive in the extreme if it thinks otherwise. By
pulling the negotiating rug from under a weak prime minister's feet the US has
at a stroke prevented Britain from building a balancing coalition in Europe and
thus play its traditional role as the balancer. Evidence of Realpolitik is apparent in
Berlin's repeated refusal to fully comply with the EU’s Services Directive
critical to the hallowed Single Market in an area where the British are strong
and Germany relatively weak. This is not German-bashing, simply strategic fact.
2.
Bad Timing:
Britain is not negotiating about its future in THIS EU; it is beginning to
negotiate a position vis-a-vis the New EUrozone EU. This new EU will be built around Germany and created
pretty swiftly (by EU standards) post-September and the German elections. The Obama
Administration by making this very public and humiliating intervention at this
critical moment has effectively cut the ground from under Cameron’s 'definitive'
speech on Europe, now scheduled for 18 January in the Netherlands. The fact that Cameron is making this critical
speech abroad and not in Britain speak volumes as does the fact he was forced to
move the date by the Germans! A sign of
things to come?
3. The
Politics of the Moment: David Cameron is one of the least strategic prime
ministers in British history and he needs all the help he can get to see the
big strategic picture, craft policy from it and have the political courage to
stick to it. Indeed, Cameron has wavered
repeatedly over recent weeks depending on which group has spoken to him
last. The Administration has critically
undermined a key negotiating lever of an already weak prime minister by effectively
forcing Cameron to abandon the Armageddon option; leaving the EU. There is now no pressure on Germany or others
to agree to give Britain any concession now that Berlin believes it has the
tacit backing of the US. Berlin also
believes that sooner or later the British people will be forced to join a
project an overwhelming majority have never wanted nor will ever want.
4. The
Future: This EU is now all about Germany and the (understandable) German desire
to pretend it is about ‘Europe’. The
rest are either too weak or too broke to matter. This is the bottom of the strategic and
political cycle for Britain which will in time recover some influence. Therefore, only Britain with US support can
ensure an enduring political balance in Europe. Critically, there are those in Berlin keen for
Britain to play just such a balancing and legitimising role. A sign of good faith would be for Berlin and Washington together to encourage Britain in such a role.
The
bottom-line: The British are already the 2nd biggest net contributors, with the
EU costing the over-stretched British taxpayer £52 million a day, reinforced by
an annual £52bn trading deficit with the EU. As such the relationship between British costs
and British benefits in THIS EU is already dangerously unbalanced. As the German-centric EUrozone consolidates
the bloc will inevitably act in unison reinforcing the economic imbalance with political fiat. Even with the so-called
‘treaty-lock’ (whereby any more shift of powers from London to Brussels automatically
triggers a referendum) Britain will be cast into a permanent minority. Therefore, the only way for Britain to remain
in the Union equitably over time is to negotiate now for a repatriation of
powers in direct proportion to the German-led integration of Eurozone national powers
that is about to happen.
Next
Steps: The US should engage in quiet diplomacy to reinforce Britain's position
vis-a-vis Germany (and to some extent France) in the implicit (and not so
implicit) European power politics. First, because Britain’s ancient liberties matter as
much to Britons as America’s to Americans and for good reason. Second, because Britain has always rightly, distrusted Continental ‘grands dessins’ that focus so much
power in so few hands via an utterly unaccountable and undemocratic Brussels. Such power gambits have never ended well in
Europe. Therefore, the US must now make
a very public commitment to ensuring that Britain's interests and influence
will be properly protected in the coming EUrozone. If not Britain’s position will become
untenable and in time no amount of American and German bullying will prevent Britain
from leaving the new EU.
The Special Relationship would then be well and truly dead. This is about Britain’s long-term future;
free-standing nation-state and American ally or province of a German-led,
Brussels-administered EU or more taxation with even less representation. Now, there’s a delicious irony. Revenge is indeed a dish best served
cold. Britain deserves better than that America.
Julian
Lindley-French
