Alphen,
Netherlands. The eleventh hour of the eleventh
day of the eleventh month. As I write
this I have just listened to the Last
Post and observed two minutes of sombre silence to mark Britain’s war
dead. This year Remembrance Day was
particularly poignant as on Friday I attended an excellent conference on the
future of European defence in the heart of Vauban’s superb seventeenth century
fortress, the Citadelle at Lille. Europe
in many ways started here. To the
immediate north and east of Lille are great battlegrounds of two world wars over
which I drove in my two hour, three country freedom journey on a tarmac carpet
across a quagmire of sacrifice from my home on the Dutch-Belgian border.
Now, I am a self-confessed Francophile who respects both France and its people. For all the British talk of“punching above our weight” it is in fact the French who repeatedly turn a difficult strategic position into effective influence at a reasonable price. And, one should be in no doubt that I believe the Franco-British strategic relationship is critical, not just for Europe but the wider world. The problem is that when the French elite talk (particularly the Left) about Britain they are not only wrong but so often determinedly wrong. It was the same on Friday. The specific (and implied) grouse was why can
Britain not see that it has no alternative but to sooner or later accept
the French view of Europe and the world?
That was not the only loaded question. So, here is the response that my weapon of mass confusion (my Yorkshire French) failed to convey:
1.
How
could Britain leave the EU and survive? Britain (GDP $2.3 trillion/€1.81
trillion, population 63.5 million, 2012 defence budget €57.9bn/$73.6bn) will become like Switzerland (GDP $600bn/€472bn, population 6.6
million, 2012 defence budget $4.9bn/€3.8bn).
No disrespect intended to the Swiss, but the facts speak for
themselves.
2.
Why
does Poland offer more troops to EU missions than Britain? It is because Britain is fighting real not
paper wars.
3.
Does
Britain not realise France and Germany will replace Britain in EU defence with
Poland (GDP €911bn/$1.16 trillion, population 38.4 million/
2012 defence budget $8.79bn/€6.92bn)? Again,
no disrespect to the Poles but who are they kidding?
4.
Why
do you British keep mentioning the number of soldiers killed in Afghanistan as it
suggests a lack of respect for the French fallen? The French armed forces are impressive and critical
partners of the British armed forces, as Libya ably demonstrated. Moreover, I honour French fallen as much as I
honour British. However, sensitivity on
this issue reflects an unwillingness to face an inconvenient truth; no union or
alliance can survive the imbalance of risk and sacrifice evident in an Afghanistan
that has critically polluted Britain’s trust in its European ‘allies’.
5.
When
the Americans pivot to Asia-Pacific you British will be forced to accept strategic modesty?
Well, no. Given the stated
British ambition to rebuild its armed forces around a maritime strategy the
British will become more not less important to an America which will care much more
for capable partners than incapable allies.
Sadly, this kind of
nonsense is also beloved of the “Little Britain” mafia in London who preach that one of the world’s most potent political and military
powers could not survive outside an EU moving in a direction that Britain
neither wants nor can be part of. And
here is the irony; after almost a century since the struggles that made my journey possible the issue is still
Germany and its power. Indeed, for all
the financial travails one hundred years on ‘Europe’ is still a metaphor for
how to accommodate Germany; friend Germany, ally German, partner Germany, but
nevertheless powerful Germany. Thankfully, the most
poignant moment this weekend was to witness the British and German ambassadors to Belgium
laying wreaths together at Ypres's famous Menin Gate.
Lille’s Citadelle was built
at a time when Louis XIV was at the height of his powers. However, it reflected the essentially
defensive nature of French thinking during yet another war with Britain. The British of course chose not to attack Louis’s
strongest point, but rather his weakest.
In 1704 Marlborough defeated Louis at the Battle of Blenheim in Austria
thus guaranteeing the very victory the Citadelle was built to prevent.
The question that no-one at the meeting dare pose was this; can Britain and France have a future strategic relationship above and beyond the EU? Given the real world (as opposed to the Euro-world) Britain and France must.
However, for that to happen the French élite must
abandon its comforting prejudice about l'albion perfide. Indeed, even if Britain
in time leaves an EU that has effectively left Britain, the British will never leave Europe. Much of my drive was across our fallen in Flanders Fields.
Britain and France together, forever, in Flanders Fields.
Britain and France together, forever, in Flanders Fields.
Julian Lindley-French
