Oslo, Norway. 13 February. The certificate room of the Nobel Institute
has the feel of the headmaster’s waiting room of an English school. This is something your Blogonaut was very
familiar with in his youth as he spent much time in such places awaiting punishment
for having been creative with school rules. Nobel Laureate Nelson Mandela sits close by
Kofi Annan, Aung San Suu Kyi jostles with Al Gore (?????) - the great, the good
and a couple of American politicians.
The citation that announced the awarding of the 2012
Nobel Peace Prize to the European Union in October last year stated, “The union
and its forerunners have for over six decades contributed to the advancement of
peace and reconciliation, democracy and human rights in Europe”. Walking through Rome’s Fiumicino Airport last
week I espied a big sign emblazoned across a wall celebrating the award and
trumpeting the message that the EU had kept the peace in Europe for sixty
years.
This week I attended the opening of the Norwegian
Atlantic Council’s Leangkollen Conference in Oslo’s Nobel Institute. Looking at the certificates awarded to Peace
Prize recipients with NATO Deputy Secretary-General Alexander Vershbow it
struck me just how unfair it is that the Alliance has not been recognised as the
true guardian of European peace during the past sixty years plus.
The 2012 award to the EU was not as preposterous as
some have suggested but it does point to the increasing politicisation of the
Nobel Peace Prize. Clearly, the role of ‘Europe’
in helping to institutionalise the post-1945 Franco-German rapprochement at the
core of European Reconciliation Phase One was vitally important. However, speaking to senior Norwegian
politicians here it is also evident that the Nobel Peace Prize is indeed becoming
politicised which is a shame. In 2009 the
Peace Prize was awarded to the then new President Barack H. Obama for simply
not being George W. Bush (where do Americans get all these superfluous initials
from?).
In reality Franco-German reconciliation could not
have taken place but for the security guarantee offered by NATO and by
extension the taxpayers of America, Britain and Canada who bore much of the cost
to keep the Red Army at bay during the deepest freezes of the Cold War. And yet go to the European Parliament and the
Euro-fanatics therein have completely air-brushed NATO out of Europe’s
contemporary history. It is as if the
Americans, British and Canadians had nothing whatsoever to do with the European
peace.
NATO set out to achieve a Europe free and
whole. One only has to survey the map of
Europe of today to see the incredible achievement of the Atlantic Alliance and
its contribution to European peace and stability. It is a peace and stability without which the
European Union simply could not exist.
It is also a continuing mission.
The EU likes to present itself as the saviour of a Europe torn apart by
war. In fact it was the 1941 Atlantic
Charter of the then two great democracies America and Britain that paved the
way not only for victory in World War Two but eventually victory in the Cold
War. However, the difference between the
EU and NATO is that the Alliance has had to take the hard, tough decisions over
the use of force upon which sustainable peace in Europe has been built at the
cost of both blood and geld.
In the Western Balkans, Afghanistan, Libya and a
host of other challenging arenas NATO wrestles with the use of legitimate,
proportionate force daily for the Alliance is no less a peace organisation than
the EU. However, NATO simply does not
have the luxury of being able to eternally theorise about peace. Crises happen and any visit to the Justus
Lipsius building, home of the European Council and known as ‘Just Lips’, the
European Commission or the European Parliament and it quickly becomes clear that
the peace-building of the EU has NATO foundations.
In an ideal world/Europe the 2012 Nobel Peace Prize would
have been awarded jointly to both the EU and NATO for they both played a
crucial role in the European peace and they will both continue to do so.
Given that the Norwegian Nobel Committee needs to go
back to first principles and ask itself a fundamental question: is the Nobel
Peace Prize only for those who seek peace through non-violent means or is the
Prize open to all those who have made a critical contribution to peace? If it is the former then both Obama and the
EU should be excluded. If it is the
latter then NATO must also be recognised.
So, when is NATO going to be awarded the Nobel Peace
Prize? 2013 would do nicely.
Julian Lindley-French
